dc sign dc signr Search Results


94
R&D Systems anti human dc sign mab
FIGURE 3. Infection of DCs with HHV-8 is blocked by anti <t>DC-SIGN</t> <t>mAb.</t> A, Immunofluorescence results on DCs that were left untreated or treated with either anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or anti-CD11a mAb, infected with HHV-8, incubated, and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb (red) at 24 h. Uninfected DCs were used as controls. B, Immunoflu- orescence results on DCs that were either treated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or left untreated, infected, and stained at 24 h with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (green) and anti-ORF 59 mAb (red). The overlay of com- bined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF 59 is shown. Cells were coun- terstained with DAPI (blue) (600). Data are from one experiment representative of eight independent experiments.
Anti Human Dc Sign Mab, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm16424204-63-9-13?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human dc sign mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
R&D Systems anti dc sign mouse mab 162
FIGURE 3. Infection of DCs with HHV-8 is blocked by anti <t>DC-SIGN</t> <t>mAb.</t> A, Immunofluorescence results on DCs that were left untreated or treated with either anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or anti-CD11a mAb, infected with HHV-8, incubated, and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb (red) at 24 h. Uninfected DCs were used as controls. B, Immunoflu- orescence results on DCs that were either treated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or left untreated, infected, and stained at 24 h with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (green) and anti-ORF 59 mAb (red). The overlay of com- bined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF 59 is shown. Cells were coun- terstained with DAPI (blue) (600). Data are from one experiment representative of eight independent experiments.
Anti Dc Sign Mouse Mab 162, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm26990254-267-7-32?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dc sign mouse mab 162 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems mab1621
FIGURE 1. Screening of phage-displayed Fabs for L-SIGN reactivity. A, Ninety-six Fab phage clones selected from three rounds of pan- ning on recombinant DC-SIGN (negative selec- tion) and L-SIGN (positive selection) proteins were screened for binding to K562 (negative control) and K562/L-SIGN-transfected cells by flow cytometry using goat anti-mouse IgG PE conjugate for detection. Only clones showing at least a 5-fold higher binding to K562/L-SIGN cells are shown. B, To select Fab phage clones uniquely reactive with L-SIGN, but not DC- SIGN, K562/L-SIGN cell-reactive clones were screened for reactivity with DC-SIGN-Fc and L- SIGN-Fc fusion proteins in a capture ELISA. mAb162 (L-SIGN specific), <t>mAb1621,</t> and mAb16211 (DC-SIGN/L-SIGN cross-reactive) were used as positive controls. Data are repre- sentative of two independent experiments.
Mab1621, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm16365436-53-36-47?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mab1621 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems anti dc sign dcsignr
FIGURE 1. Screening of phage-displayed Fabs for L-SIGN reactivity. A, Ninety-six Fab phage clones selected from three rounds of pan- ning on recombinant DC-SIGN (negative selec- tion) and L-SIGN (positive selection) proteins were screened for binding to K562 (negative control) and K562/L-SIGN-transfected cells by flow cytometry using goat anti-mouse IgG PE conjugate for detection. Only clones showing at least a 5-fold higher binding to K562/L-SIGN cells are shown. B, To select Fab phage clones uniquely reactive with L-SIGN, but not DC- SIGN, K562/L-SIGN cell-reactive clones were screened for reactivity with DC-SIGN-Fc and L- SIGN-Fc fusion proteins in a capture ELISA. mAb162 (L-SIGN specific), <t>mAb1621,</t> and mAb16211 (DC-SIGN/L-SIGN cross-reactive) were used as positive controls. Data are repre- sentative of two independent experiments.
Anti Dc Sign Dcsignr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/10__1172_slash_jci129171-296-28-31?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dc sign dcsignr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti dc signr mouse monoclonal antibody
Clinical data of the lung cancer patients in ELISA study
Anti Dc Signr Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pmc07101997-66-23-28?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dc signr mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems lectins
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
Lectins, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pmc07122727-60-14-19?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lectins - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti l sign antibodies
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
Anti L Sign Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm40143272-52-9-12?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti l sign antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems recombinant human dc signr fc chimera
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
Recombinant Human Dc Signr Fc Chimera, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pmc05390362-89-0-10?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human dc signr fc chimera - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems 2014 n a anti human clec4m r
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
2014 N A Anti Human Clec4m R, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm31402260-202-130-134?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2014 n a anti human clec4m r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems 162 d2 050
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
162 D2 050, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pm31402260-203-143-138?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
162 d2 050 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals α dc sign dc signr antibody
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
α Dc Sign Dc Signr Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pmc08647855-205-10-14?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
α dc sign dc signr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems anti dc sign dc signr
Structure <t>of</t> <t>DC-SIGN</t> and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type <t>lectins</t> DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.
Anti Dc Sign Dc Signr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dc+sign+dc+signr/pmc07138800-174-20-23?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dc sign dc signr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIGURE 3. Infection of DCs with HHV-8 is blocked by anti DC-SIGN mAb. A, Immunofluorescence results on DCs that were left untreated or treated with either anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or anti-CD11a mAb, infected with HHV-8, incubated, and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb (red) at 24 h. Uninfected DCs were used as controls. B, Immunoflu- orescence results on DCs that were either treated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or left untreated, infected, and stained at 24 h with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (green) and anti-ORF 59 mAb (red). The overlay of com- bined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF 59 is shown. Cells were coun- terstained with DAPI (blue) (600). Data are from one experiment representative of eight independent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: DC-SIGN is a receptor for human herpesvirus 8 on dendritic cells and macrophages.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3. Infection of DCs with HHV-8 is blocked by anti DC-SIGN mAb. A, Immunofluorescence results on DCs that were left untreated or treated with either anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or anti-CD11a mAb, infected with HHV-8, incubated, and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb (red) at 24 h. Uninfected DCs were used as controls. B, Immunoflu- orescence results on DCs that were either treated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or left untreated, infected, and stained at 24 h with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (green) and anti-ORF 59 mAb (red). The overlay of com- bined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF 59 is shown. Cells were coun- terstained with DAPI (blue) (600). Data are from one experiment representative of eight independent experiments.

Article Snippet: For blocking studies, cells were pretreated with 20 g/ml anti-human-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507; R&D Systems, or clone DCN46; BD Biosciences), anti-CD11a mAb (BD Biosciences), mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), or 100 g/ml mannan (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 4°C before exposure to HHV-8.

Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Staining

FIGURE 4. DC-SIGN expression renders resistant cells susceptible to HHV-8 infection. A, Immunofluorescence results on K562 and K562-DC- SIGN cells that were infected with HHV-8 and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb at 24 h (red). B, Immunofluorescence results on B-LCL and B-LCL DC-SIGN that were infected with HHV-8 and stained after 24 h with anti- K8.1A/B mAb (red). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (600). Data are from one experiment representative of five independent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: DC-SIGN is a receptor for human herpesvirus 8 on dendritic cells and macrophages.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4. DC-SIGN expression renders resistant cells susceptible to HHV-8 infection. A, Immunofluorescence results on K562 and K562-DC- SIGN cells that were infected with HHV-8 and stained with anti-K8.1A/B mAb at 24 h (red). B, Immunofluorescence results on B-LCL and B-LCL DC-SIGN that were infected with HHV-8 and stained after 24 h with anti- K8.1A/B mAb (red). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (600). Data are from one experiment representative of five independent experiments.

Article Snippet: For blocking studies, cells were pretreated with 20 g/ml anti-human-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507; R&D Systems, or clone DCN46; BD Biosciences), anti-CD11a mAb (BD Biosciences), mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), or 100 g/ml mannan (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 4°C before exposure to HHV-8.

Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Staining

FIGURE 5. HHV-8 binds to DC-SIGN. A, Inhibition of binding of radio- actively labeled HHV-8 by treatment of target cells with anti-DC-SIGN mAb. DCs or B-LCL-DC-SIGN were pretreated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or mannan, or left untreated. Each bar represents the mean percent of binding inhibition ( SE) (compared with untreated cells) from two duplicate determinations. B, Inhibition of binding of radioactively labeled HHV-8 by treatment of virus with soluble DC-SIGN. Results are the mean ( SE) per- centage of inhibition of binding of soluble DC-SIGN-treated HHV-8 com- pared with binding of radiolabeled untreated virus to each cell type from two determinations. C, Dose response of inhibition of virus binding to DCs by treatment with anti-DC-SIGN mAb. Each bar represents the mean of duplicate reactions ( SE) from duplicate determinations. Data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: DC-SIGN is a receptor for human herpesvirus 8 on dendritic cells and macrophages.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 5. HHV-8 binds to DC-SIGN. A, Inhibition of binding of radio- actively labeled HHV-8 by treatment of target cells with anti-DC-SIGN mAb. DCs or B-LCL-DC-SIGN were pretreated with anti-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or mannan, or left untreated. Each bar represents the mean percent of binding inhibition ( SE) (compared with untreated cells) from two duplicate determinations. B, Inhibition of binding of radioactively labeled HHV-8 by treatment of virus with soluble DC-SIGN. Results are the mean ( SE) per- centage of inhibition of binding of soluble DC-SIGN-treated HHV-8 com- pared with binding of radiolabeled untreated virus to each cell type from two determinations. C, Dose response of inhibition of virus binding to DCs by treatment with anti-DC-SIGN mAb. Each bar represents the mean of duplicate reactions ( SE) from duplicate determinations. Data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: For blocking studies, cells were pretreated with 20 g/ml anti-human-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507; R&D Systems, or clone DCN46; BD Biosciences), anti-CD11a mAb (BD Biosciences), mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), or 100 g/ml mannan (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 4°C before exposure to HHV-8.

Techniques: Inhibition, Binding Assay, Labeling, Virus

FIGURE 6. HHV-8 infection of IL-13-activated macrophages is related to DC-SIGN expression. A, Flow cytometric analysis showing expression of DC-SIGN on HHV-8-infected (empty histogram, broken line) or un- infected (empty histogram, solid line) IL-13-activated macrophages. Full histogram, isotype controls. B, Im- munofluorescence results on IL-13-activated macro- phages that were infected with HHV-8 for 24 h and stained for ORF 59 (red) and DC-SIGN (green). The overlay of combined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF59 is shown. C, Immunofluorescence results on IL- 13-activated macrophages that were pretreated with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or mouse IgG, infected with HHV-8 for 24 h and stained for anti-K8.1 mAb (red). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (600). Data are from one experiment representative of four in- dependent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: DC-SIGN is a receptor for human herpesvirus 8 on dendritic cells and macrophages.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 6. HHV-8 infection of IL-13-activated macrophages is related to DC-SIGN expression. A, Flow cytometric analysis showing expression of DC-SIGN on HHV-8-infected (empty histogram, broken line) or un- infected (empty histogram, solid line) IL-13-activated macrophages. Full histogram, isotype controls. B, Im- munofluorescence results on IL-13-activated macro- phages that were infected with HHV-8 for 24 h and stained for ORF 59 (red) and DC-SIGN (green). The overlay of combined colors for anti-DC-SIGN and ORF59 is shown. C, Immunofluorescence results on IL- 13-activated macrophages that were pretreated with anti- DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507) or mouse IgG, infected with HHV-8 for 24 h and stained for anti-K8.1 mAb (red). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (600). Data are from one experiment representative of four in- dependent experiments.

Article Snippet: For blocking studies, cells were pretreated with 20 g/ml anti-human-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507; R&D Systems, or clone DCN46; BD Biosciences), anti-CD11a mAb (BD Biosciences), mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), or 100 g/ml mannan (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 4°C before exposure to HHV-8.

Techniques: Infection, Expressing, Staining

FIGURE 7. Effect of HHV-8 in- fection of DCs on expression of DC- SIGN and costimulatory molecules. A, DC-SIGN expression on unin- fected or HHV-8 infected DCs. Data are mean MFI (SE) from seven in- dependent experiments. B, Expres- sion of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD83, and DC-SIGN on infected DCs. Blue histogram, HHV-8-infected DCs; yellow histogram, uninfected DCs; empty histogram, fine line, and bro- ken line isotype controls for the infected and uninfected DCs, respec- tively. Data are from one experiment representative of 10 independent ex- periments. C, Confocal microscopy of HHV-8-infected DCs stained with anti-DC-SIGN (green) and anti-ORF 59 (red) mAbs at 24 h (left panel) and 48 h (center panel) after infection. Uninfected DCs served as controls (right panel). Data are from one ex- periment representative of two inde- pendent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: DC-SIGN is a receptor for human herpesvirus 8 on dendritic cells and macrophages.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 7. Effect of HHV-8 in- fection of DCs on expression of DC- SIGN and costimulatory molecules. A, DC-SIGN expression on unin- fected or HHV-8 infected DCs. Data are mean MFI (SE) from seven in- dependent experiments. B, Expres- sion of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD83, and DC-SIGN on infected DCs. Blue histogram, HHV-8-infected DCs; yellow histogram, uninfected DCs; empty histogram, fine line, and bro- ken line isotype controls for the infected and uninfected DCs, respec- tively. Data are from one experiment representative of 10 independent ex- periments. C, Confocal microscopy of HHV-8-infected DCs stained with anti-DC-SIGN (green) and anti-ORF 59 (red) mAbs at 24 h (left panel) and 48 h (center panel) after infection. Uninfected DCs served as controls (right panel). Data are from one ex- periment representative of two inde- pendent experiments.

Article Snippet: For blocking studies, cells were pretreated with 20 g/ml anti-human-DC-SIGN mAb (clone 120507; R&D Systems, or clone DCN46; BD Biosciences), anti-CD11a mAb (BD Biosciences), mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich), or 100 g/ml mannan (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 4°C before exposure to HHV-8.

Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Confocal Microscopy, Staining

FIGURE 1. Screening of phage-displayed Fabs for L-SIGN reactivity. A, Ninety-six Fab phage clones selected from three rounds of pan- ning on recombinant DC-SIGN (negative selec- tion) and L-SIGN (positive selection) proteins were screened for binding to K562 (negative control) and K562/L-SIGN-transfected cells by flow cytometry using goat anti-mouse IgG PE conjugate for detection. Only clones showing at least a 5-fold higher binding to K562/L-SIGN cells are shown. B, To select Fab phage clones uniquely reactive with L-SIGN, but not DC- SIGN, K562/L-SIGN cell-reactive clones were screened for reactivity with DC-SIGN-Fc and L- SIGN-Fc fusion proteins in a capture ELISA. mAb162 (L-SIGN specific), mAb1621, and mAb16211 (DC-SIGN/L-SIGN cross-reactive) were used as positive controls. Data are repre- sentative of two independent experiments.

Journal: Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)

Article Title: Internalizing antibodies to the C-type lectins, L-SIGN and DC-SIGN, inhibit viral glycoprotein binding and deliver antigen to human dendritic cells for the induction of T cell responses.

doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.1.426

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1. Screening of phage-displayed Fabs for L-SIGN reactivity. A, Ninety-six Fab phage clones selected from three rounds of pan- ning on recombinant DC-SIGN (negative selec- tion) and L-SIGN (positive selection) proteins were screened for binding to K562 (negative control) and K562/L-SIGN-transfected cells by flow cytometry using goat anti-mouse IgG PE conjugate for detection. Only clones showing at least a 5-fold higher binding to K562/L-SIGN cells are shown. B, To select Fab phage clones uniquely reactive with L-SIGN, but not DC- SIGN, K562/L-SIGN cell-reactive clones were screened for reactivity with DC-SIGN-Fc and L- SIGN-Fc fusion proteins in a capture ELISA. mAb162 (L-SIGN specific), mAb1621, and mAb16211 (DC-SIGN/L-SIGN cross-reactive) were used as positive controls. Data are repre- sentative of two independent experiments.

Article Snippet: Before their use in assays, RBC were lysed and any remaining dead cells were further depleted using a dead cell removal kit (Miltenyi Biotec; catalog 130-090-101), per the manufacturer’s instructions. mAbs mAb162 (reactive only with L-SIGN), mAb1621, and mAb16211 (cross-reactive with DC-SIGN and L-SIGN) were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Clone Assay, Recombinant, Selection, Binding Assay, Negative Control, Transfection, Cytometry, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Clinical data of the lung cancer patients in ELISA study

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical data of the lung cancer patients in ELISA study

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Low serum levels of DC-SIGNR in lung cancer patients. The scatter plot displays DC-SIGNR levels in serum samples from 173 lung cancer patients and 134 healthy controls were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Each point represents the serum DC-SIGNR level of one sample. The horizontal lines indicate the median levels. Serum DC-SIGNR was significantly lower in lung cancer patients compared with healthy controls ( P = 0.0003) ( a ). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for serum DC-SIGNR in lung cancer prediction. A cut-off value of 3.8998 ng/L for DC-SIGNR to predict the presence of lung cancer with 78.03 % sensitivity and 49.25 % specificity (Area under curve (AUC) = 0.6212, P = 0.0003) ( b )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Low serum levels of DC-SIGNR in lung cancer patients. The scatter plot displays DC-SIGNR levels in serum samples from 173 lung cancer patients and 134 healthy controls were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Each point represents the serum DC-SIGNR level of one sample. The horizontal lines indicate the median levels. Serum DC-SIGNR was significantly lower in lung cancer patients compared with healthy controls ( P = 0.0003) ( a ). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for serum DC-SIGNR in lung cancer prediction. A cut-off value of 3.8998 ng/L for DC-SIGNR to predict the presence of lung cancer with 78.03 % sensitivity and 49.25 % specificity (Area under curve (AUC) = 0.6212, P = 0.0003) ( b )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Serum DC-SIGNR levels were significantly correlated with brain metastasis. The serum levels of DC-SIGNR were not significantly different between metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.3887) ( a ). Serum concentrations of DC-SIGNR were higher in brain metastasis than in non-metastasis ( P = 0.0283) ( b ). However, the serum DC-SIGNR levels were not significantly different between bone metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.3841), lung metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.6744), lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.9880) ( b )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Serum DC-SIGNR levels were significantly correlated with brain metastasis. The serum levels of DC-SIGNR were not significantly different between metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.3887) ( a ). Serum concentrations of DC-SIGNR were higher in brain metastasis than in non-metastasis ( P = 0.0283) ( b ). However, the serum DC-SIGNR levels were not significantly different between bone metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.3841), lung metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.6744), lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis ( P = 0.9880) ( b )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques:

Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with NK, CD3, CD4, and CD8 levels. Serum DC-SIGNR levels correlated significantly with percent of NK cells in lung cancer patients ( P = 0.0017) ( a ). Serum levels of DC-SIGNR showed no significant correlation with CD3 ( b ), CD4 ( c ), and CD8 ( d )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with NK, CD3, CD4, and CD8 levels. Serum DC-SIGNR levels correlated significantly with percent of NK cells in lung cancer patients ( P = 0.0017) ( a ). Serum levels of DC-SIGNR showed no significant correlation with CD3 ( b ), CD4 ( c ), and CD8 ( d )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques:

Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with clinical data. Serum levels of DC-SIGNR showed no significant correlation with gender ( a ), age ( b , c ), cancer stage ( d ), and histologic subtype ( e , f )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with clinical data. Serum levels of DC-SIGNR showed no significant correlation with gender ( a ), age ( b , c ), cancer stage ( d ), and histologic subtype ( e , f )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques:

Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with tumor markers. Serum levels of DC-SIGNR displayed no significant correlation with S100β ( a ) CEA ( b ), NSE ( c ), and CYFRA21-1 ( d )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlations of serum levels of DC-SIGNR with tumor markers. Serum levels of DC-SIGNR displayed no significant correlation with S100β ( a ) CEA ( b ), NSE ( c ), and CYFRA21-1 ( d )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques:

IHC for DC-SIGNR expression in tissues of lung cancer tissues, tuberculosis patients, and normal tissues. IHC analysis was used to determine DC-SIGNR expression and arrows indicate positive staining. Areas in the black boxes of A, C, E, G, and I were enlarged below. DC-SIGNR expression was detected in lung tissues from tuberculosis patients ( a – b ). DC-SIGNR expression was detected in the lung tissues from lung cancer patients ( c – d ). DC-SIGNR expression in alveolar epithelia cells of normal lung tissues ( e – f ). DC-SIGNR expression in lymphatic endothelial cells exhibited strong positive ( g – h ). Normal lymph node tissues were used as a negative control ( i–j )

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: IHC for DC-SIGNR expression in tissues of lung cancer tissues, tuberculosis patients, and normal tissues. IHC analysis was used to determine DC-SIGNR expression and arrows indicate positive staining. Areas in the black boxes of A, C, E, G, and I were enlarged below. DC-SIGNR expression was detected in lung tissues from tuberculosis patients ( a – b ). DC-SIGNR expression was detected in the lung tissues from lung cancer patients ( c – d ). DC-SIGNR expression in alveolar epithelia cells of normal lung tissues ( e – f ). DC-SIGNR expression in lymphatic endothelial cells exhibited strong positive ( g – h ). Normal lymph node tissues were used as a negative control ( i–j )

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Negative Control

Semi-quantitative image analysis of DC-SIGNR expression in tissues. The graph displays a scatter plot of the levels of DC-SIGNR expression in lung tissues from lung cancer patients, tuberculosis patients, and normal controls. There was a statistical significance in IHC for DC-SIGNR expression between lung cancer tissues and normal lung tissues ( P = 0.0418), tuberculosis tissues and normal controls ( P = 0.0289). There was no significantly difference between lung cancer patients and tuberculosis patients ( P = 0.2696). DC-SIGNR expression in lung cancer patients was lower than in normal lung tissues

Journal: Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

Article Title: Low expression of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin-related protein in lung cancer and significant correlations with brain metastasis and natural killer cells

doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2465-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Semi-quantitative image analysis of DC-SIGNR expression in tissues. The graph displays a scatter plot of the levels of DC-SIGNR expression in lung tissues from lung cancer patients, tuberculosis patients, and normal controls. There was a statistical significance in IHC for DC-SIGNR expression between lung cancer tissues and normal lung tissues ( P = 0.0418), tuberculosis tissues and normal controls ( P = 0.0289). There was no significantly difference between lung cancer patients and tuberculosis patients ( P = 0.2696). DC-SIGNR expression in lung cancer patients was lower than in normal lung tissues

Article Snippet: Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, PBST was used to wash the plates 3 times, and 100 μl anti-DC-SIGNR mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb, R&D Systems, Inc., USA, Catalog Number: MAB16211) diluted to a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to each wells.

Techniques: Expressing

Structure of DC-SIGN and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type lectins DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.

Journal: Glycovirology Protocols

Article Title: The C Type Lectins DC-SIGN and L-SIGN

doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-393-6_4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Structure of DC-SIGN and L-SIGN proteins. The C-type lectins DC-SIGN and L-SIGN are type II transmembrane proteins. Their cytoplasmic tails contain internalization signals (di-leucine, tyrosine, and tri-acidic) which are involved in internalization of the lectin. The extracellular domain is composed of a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a neck domain (conserved in the case of DC-SIGN, variable for L-SIGN) implicated in the oligomerization of these lectins. The oligomerization is probably important for the orientation and subsequently for the function of the CRDs.

Article Snippet: Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against DC-SIGN (FAb161P), L-SIGN (FAb162P), or both lectins (FAb1621P) were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: